First Look: Backpackinglight.co.uk Titanium Stoves

I’m siting here eating dehydrated curry which is 10 months old for my lunch. A bit past it’s prime but eatable (I hope). The reason? I’ve been playing with Bob’s new titanium stoves and I thought I’d share some fist impressions. Apologies in advance. This is going to sound like weird Darren at the height of his powers.

Alcohol Hybrids

In a recent post I talked about using these stoves in the Pyrenees. Here I was attracted by them as wood burning stoves with the option of using them as an alcohol frame and windshield if I hit bad weather.

But for this post I’m thinking UK and TGO Challenge and that means looking at things the other way around. How do these work as alcohol stove frames primarily, giving you the option of burning wood if the weather gives us the chance.

So, I bought a load of gear together. There were a number of pots, including: an MSR Kettle, a Ti Kettle from Vargo, the Mountain Laurel Designs pot and some kind of unbranded pot that Bob gave me years ago — wider and taller than the Ti and the MLD designs.

On the alcohol stove front I gathered together three stoves that I have used often, the Caldera Cone burner, the Whitebox stove and the Vargo Triad stove. (Hmm, just finished the food — if I’m dead tomorrow you’ll know why!)

Now, I’m not going to get too technical with you here — that might come later — but I did arrange a kind of control using my standard kit of recent years.

Caldera Reference

Over the last two years my standard alcohol kit has been a Caldera Cone system (actually two as I have one for a two person pot and one for the MLD pot). The Caldera is a very fuel efficient system. I boiled up 400 mls of water in the cone — which is actually quite a lot, away more than you would need for a hot drink for example.

The backpacking light.co.uk stoves

I set out to try both the titanium Honey Stove (which can be used in large or a compact format) and the new pocket Stove. If you have a Honey Stove you will be familiar with the module design and it’s flat panel design.

The Pocket Stove

This was the first time that I have looked at the Pocket Stove. The stove comes in some lovely packaging, a meal tin with a colour design embossed into it. As you take it out of its envelope it feels like a quality product and not like a cottage industry product.

The stove is a simple design. There are three side plates, one ‘door’ and a base plate which can fit into one of two height positions. If you loved Meccanno as a kid assembling this will be easy. But even if you are clumsy like me you will have it together in no time.

Once assembled you have a rock solid stove that sits nicely above the ground. But of the alcohol stoves that I own only the Vargo Triad really fits. Apparently, the Evernew Titanium Stove sits in there very nicely but I’ve never found the need to get out and buy one. I have played with the Evernew though and its accompanying wind shield. I’ve no doubt from what I’ve seen so far that an ever new Burner and Pocket Stove will be far superior in use than the complete Evernew system. it is sturdy and far less fiddly and easier to load up with wood.

The Honey Stove

Just like the original Honey Stove but half the weight. It comes with six sides and a door, two base plates (one for the large configuration and one for the smaller square config), an adapter to hold a Trangia burner and a stainless steel grill — very popular with bushcraft folks who like nothing better than to stride out into the wilderness and cook supermarket beef burgers/patties!

The Honey Stove is an ingenious design but it always felt heavy to me. Just weighing it up in my hand this was not something I wanted to carry in my pack. The titanium version in half the weight but in the hand it feels a magnitude lighter than that. Most weight conscious backpackers will just pick this up and think, yep this is about right. For my backpacking test I assumed that I wouldn’t carry with me the trangia holder or the grill and this obviously takes the weight down. I’d also thought that I would probably only ever use the stove in Square format.

 

First Results

Amazingly it is the full Honey Stove configuration that has impressed me the most (though the Pocket Stove may be the most useful — see below).

First up I place the Caldera Cone burner in the full honey stove, simply just sitting it on the base plate. A pot was suspended above it using two thin titanium pegs which slip across the width of the stove.

The Caldera burner is not titanium but it is very light, although not particularly tough.

The burner worked well and I reckon was almost as fuel efficient as the Cone, which I hand’t expected.

The Caldera burner is too wide for either the pocket stove or the smaller Honey configuration.

Next I turned to the Whitebox. This is a brute of a stove, not as fuel efficient as some but it gets your water boiling very quickly.

The Pocket Stove is really too small for the Whitebox. The small format Honey doesn’t look that comfortable either. But in the Honey Stove the Whitebox really comes alive. This is a stove that needs a very good wind shield and this what the Whitebox needs. But it does use a lot of fuel.

Rediscovery of the Triad

Things really got interesting when I turned to the Vargo Triad.

The Triad is aver interesting stove. Its made of titanium and weighs only 24 grams. It has these clever little pot supports which can be used to pour unused fuel back into your fuel bottle. And it is very fuel efficient. I’ve always had the impression that this was the most fuel efficient stove that I had. I’ve not tested this but people have written to Bob having done so and they’ve come up with similar conclusions.

I can remember Bob and I using the Triad on a wild camping trip about seven or eight years ago. There are some basic problems with it. This tiny stove has three feet that are designed to sink into the ground and keep it stable. But in reality I’ve always found that it is too close to the ground and it is far too easy to set fire to dry grass.

The baseplates of both the Honey Stove and the Pocket Stoves are engineered so that the three legs can slip through an then be folded under to make it secure. The height of the stove from the ground is increased considerably.

So, first up I used this in full Honey configuration. It burned effectively and long. In full mode my pots could simply sit on top of the Vargo pot in the way that it was designed.

Next, I attached the Vargo to the  half sized Honey baseplate. This meant that my pro sat on top of the stove and that it was positioned higher above the flame than it would have been when used in native mode as it where. But the stove still burned well and seemed to be efficient.

Next, I tried the Vargo in the Pocket Stove and this worked just as well. This seemed as efficient as the Caldera Cone system but felt far more substantial.

So, I then took out the full Caldera system. The ‘cone’ is quite fragile and made of thin aluminium foil. The cone has to sit inside a plastic holder which also contains a fuel measure and a fuel bottle. The plastic holder is food grade and so can be used for drink or eating, although the latter would get messy.

The Pocket Stove weighs 56 grams and with the box 110 grams. Of course you don’t need the box, you could always stash the flat sections in your pot. A Triad stove weighs 24 grams. Add this lot together and your package is lighter than the Caldera Cone system. It is more solid and robust and performs equally as well. I reckon it will be longer lasting than the Cone. I’ll have to test this out further but I think the Triad will be just as fuel efficient, not least because it is easy to blow the stove out and return unused alcohol to its bottle.

So, a Triad and a Pocket Stove is a very solid and adaptable piece of kit. It can easily be a wood burner as well and I guess would be a better option that the Caldera wood burner/combo stove.

So, what to take on the Challenge?

Well, the Triad-Pocket Stove combo is high on the list. But surprisingly it is the full Honey Stove Monty that is appealing, certainly if the weather forecast is promising.

The full Monty with Triad weighs about 180 grams. Who knows if the weather is good I’ll be using my grill to cook sirloin steak a la Humphrey!

More to follow.

Comments

  1. jsm_zero says:

    I have to concur with all you say about the Ti Pocket stove. I have just returned from Scotland (1446 miles in 3.5 days) and used the Pocket Stove with a Trangia. Nothing like it in my extensive alcohol armoury. It can be used with the Caldera Cone burner if one is prepared to take tin-snips to the base plate or a spare (caldera cone burner that is)…which I did and the performance exceeds (only just and is sheltered conditions) the Caldera Cone, in both speed and fuel efficiency.

  2. Andy Williams says:

    I’ll very likely be taking the Ti Honey stove on the Challenge, along with a minibull design wick stove. A very light combination that’ll allow me to do proper cooking if I have the energy and inclination. Let’s face it, we’re spoiled with alcohol burners these days. No matter what combination of weight, durability, efficiency and versatility suits your cooking style there’s someone making one that’s suitable.

  3. John says:

    There are significant weight savings to be made here for us wood burners. One problem with the Bushbuddy is having something large enough to put it in. My Tibetan 1100 weighs 5ozs, and the Bushbuddy also 5ozs = 10ozs. An Evernew 600, say, weighs 3.5ozs, and the Pocket Stove 2ozs = 5.5ozs, making a saving of 4.5ozs, and some pack space.

    The Caldera cone system in alcohol mode has the pan inside the cone, instead of sitting on top like the Pocket stove. One would think this is more efficient, has anyone done any tests?

    Lastly, the Ti Caldera can be stored inside your pan as the Trail Designs ULC or Sidewinder, so doing away with the plastic storage thingy.

  4. andy says:

    John, I had be same thoughts as you about the efficiency of the Cone but it doesn’t seem to be the case in practice. I used a Caldera burner with both the Honey and the Cone, measuring the same amount fuel. No appreciable difference. The Honey has three solid sides and heat does build up inside.

  5. andy says:

    The Sidewinder system s good but is expensive I feel.

  6. andy says:

    Which Minibull stove

  7. John says:

    The Sidewinder certainly is expensive, $175 + pp if you need a new pan to fit it. Also, if you have the Inferno (wood burning) option, there are a lot of very light extra pieces to tread on or get blown about , I make it seven in all. The Pocket looks pleasingly simple, but does it burn wood as efficiently as the Bushbuddy?
    JohnHansford

  8. andy says:

    John,

    Spent today gardening and playing with wood burning.

    In many ways the Pocket is fine though it needs a bit more attention and preparation but of course you don’t have the wind problems you do with the BB. I found I had to blow on the stove and watch it carefully. I general I didn’t find it an worse than BB.

    The wood around here is not all that dry. This is where the Honey scores as its large scale means you can get a really good fire going quickly and even with no wind it gets enough of a breeze.

    For hee TGO Challenge Andy Wiliams might be right, the Honey would be easier to use. But I suspect practice will make the Pocket easier.

  9. John says:

    Yes, trying to make a cuppa with damp wood can be a bit of a miserable experience, partly because the fire box of my Bushbuddy is so tiny. If I am on a local walk and it has been raining or there is snow lying I take a small bag of wood from home : the advantage of a tiny stove is that it only needs a tiny amount of wood. I find beech twigs very good, and about 3ozs is enough. I don’t boil my water, but put the tea bag in from cold, and then 75′C is enough : any more and I would have to cool it down to put the milk in anyway. With alcohol, I measure in 12.5ml or so, and when the fuel goes out , my tea is ready. Perfect cuppa.

    I don’t find wind a problem with a wrap of Al foil held in place with some fine wire. In fact the cool base of the BB means you can hold it up in the wind for a quick rev up.

    The BB, and probably all the wood burners also make excellent toasters. I pre-toast and butter a few crumpets at home, and then when it’s brew time on the traiI, I get enough embers going and put a crumpet on the pan supports to heat through. Hiking heaven.

    JohnHansford

  10. andy says:

    Sensible advice John. The best Steve gadget I have is the mini fuel measurement cup that comes with the Caldera Cone!

  11. JohnHansford says:

    Mine came with with my Brasslite Turbo IIF, a great little alcohol stove with its own simmer ring. It is a 9oz capacity bottle with an optic type chamber into which you can squeeze a precise amount of fuel, hence the rather exact measurement above. It really is that accurate. I’ve seen the same sort of thing in the automotive shops for putting in fuel additives.

  12. JohnHansford says:

    Have you seen that U-tube video of a Nivea stove? Looks really neat, if a little hot. Any idea what the black tin content would be? Presumably not the original Nivea.

  13. Andy Williams says:

    It’s the Minibull M4 stove I’ll be taking. It can simmer but you can crank it right up for boiling. I have to be careful with cooking kit, it’s the one area I tend to overdo it weight wise.

Speak Your Mind

*