Must Be This Way

Home Dehydration | First steps with a Digital SLR Camera | First Steps in the Pyrenees | Home   

Photo Project: Exposure — ISO Speeds

Photo

So far we have considered changing exposure, or bracketing, using either aperture or shutter speed (or a combination of both). I’ve assumed that we all have manual mode but David asks what happens if you only shoot on automatic? Well, I’ll deal with that in a little while — but it is a good question.

What is this ISO?

This is another thing that harks back to the age of film, and this helps us understand things a little.

In the days of film we used to buy film of a certain speed. Most everyday film had a speed of around 100 or 200 ISO or ASA (these are both mean the same thing). On top of this there were ‘faster films’ of about 400 ASA for use in dimmer lighting conditions or for when you needed very high shutter speed (for example when ‘freezing’ fast action sports). There were also some even faster, expensive films, with ISO rates of 1000 or more.

Faster films sacrificed quality for speed. The 400 films could give good results, but the film did not have as much latitude (it was prone to bleaching) and was not of the same high resolution. With film we talked about ‘grain’. The faster the film the grainer the photo, i.e. you could see the individual ‘pixels’, or dots, of film.

Sports photographers, for example, often ‘pushed’ their film even faster by extending development time. This resulted in very grainy prints and no doubt you’ll have seen many of these.

Back to Digital

To some extent digital suffers from the same thing. The faster the ISO speed the lower the quality of the image. Basically, the sensor has less light to deal with when capturing detail and captures it at a lower resolution. Again you can see the ‘grain’ on very ‘fast’ shots although often this is not as attractive as it was with film.

The good news with digital though is that modern cameras are no where near as sensitive when it comes to ISO.

Film cameras often started their speed at 50 and went up to 1600 or 3200. Today’s digital cameras start at 100 or 200. The detail at 200 ISO is often just as good as 100. This is good for photographers as it gives us an extra ’stop’ of light to play with.

For many shots you may well find that you have to go beyond ISO 800 to see a real drop in quality. You can see the difference on big prints but for normal prints, or use on the web, you may well find you get very acceptable images up to ISO 800. When I first had my digital camera I took to the hills for two weeks. It was only when coming home I noticed I’d shot the whole trip at ISO 800! However, the images are still useable.

But, despite the tolerance of new cameras, shoot at the lowest ISO setting you can. The quality will be better and the latitude of the shot (the range it which it captures clear detail) will be better. Step up to ISO 400 only in poor light.

As ever these rules are there to be broken and a creative photographer can use higher ISO speeds to get all kinds of effects. But for most shots — and when starting out — shoot at ISO 200.

Bracketing with Automatic Cameras

And finally, to David’s question!

Yes you can bracket with an automatic camera — and ISO is the tool you need.

Let’s suppose we’re taking a shot of the land and the sky. It is a very bright day. It is possible that the camera will expose for the brightness of the sky and loose the detail of the darker, shadowy, earth. Or alternatively, you may have only a small section of brightness in your picture. The camera may expose for the majority dull bits but it will risk bleaching out detail in the small, but important, bright bit!

Got it?

So, we might decide to bracket our shots to capture the image, it being such a wonderful view!

We’re stuck with camera automatic. This will calculate its base exposure whatever you do. But we want to over-ride it.

Let’s suppose we think we might need a shot with more light, in other words were worried about over exposing the shot. We need to ‘fool the camera’. The first shot (with standard exposure) was shot at ISO 200. To get a bracketed shot with more exposure simply reset the ISO dial to ISO 100.

This might seem counter intuitive but it will tell the camera to expose more detail, By going from 200 to 100 we will have bracketed by one stop – i.e. over exposed by one stop.

On the other hand, if we think the camera might be bleaching out detail, bracket the other way. Set the ISO to 400 and the camera will think it needs less light. You will be bracketing by one stop in the other direction.

This is a little crude David but you’ll find it works. The next time you are out in the hills find a good shot with reasonably stable light. Take a range of shots at different ISO speeds (with the first being ‘normal’) and just see how the details differs when you get back home.

Thanks to Des Horan for pointing out I’d got the bracketing the wrong way round for this last bit — I’ve now changed it, mind you I’m still confused. Best stick to manual !!!

posted by andy on 09.16.08 @ 8:34 am | 3 Comments

3 Comments so far
Leave a comment

Andy, I didn’t ask a question about fooling the camera into a different exposure time, I tried to explain how I fool my camera into the exposure time I want. But back to your bracketing with automatic cameras method, won’t your camera simply recalculate it’s exposure time when you switch iso settings? This will only work if you can fix the exposure time calculated on the first photo?
Regards, David

By David on 09.16.08 2:18 pm

Although I didn’t know what it was called, I used to bracket with my digital camera by “half-clicking”, i.e. setting the auto mode for that shot, at different distances from the horizon. So for example I would take one shot with the half click set slightly above the horizon and that would capture the cloud detail but leave areas of the ground too dark. Half-clicking just below the horizon would reveal those dark areas but the sky and cloud detail would be lost in glare and by half clicking directly on the horizon I would get the half-way house.
This technique worked well for me and I would just generally keep the best resulting photo and delete the two worst ones.

Really enjoying this series Andy; I’ve just bought a Panasonic FZ28 (bridge camera) and many of the settings are beginning to make sense!

By Lone Walker on 09.16.08 4:11 pm

ISO…

*head begins to swim*

This is really *great* stuff, Andy. Thanks very much indeed for going to the trouble of explaining it all. It’s going to take me a long time to get to grips with it all, but it’s really great to have this series of articles just at the very time when I’m trying to learn to use the camera.

By Peewiglet on 09.18.08 10:28 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.


Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)




RSS Newsfeed

Twitter: @mustbethisway
Twitter (all other stuff): @Andrew_Howell

Must Be This Way Twitter Twibe #MBTW

The Colin Ibbotson Pages

Guide to Home Hydration

FIRST STEPS IN THE PYRENEES SERIES

Pyrenees Trail Journal 2008 — Cauterets, Ordessa, Néovielle

Cairngorms by Sleeper, mini-break report

First steps with a digital SLR camera

TGO 2006 TRAIL JOURNAL
TGO 2007 TRAIL JOURNAL
TGO 2009 TRAIL JOURNAL
NEW—TGO 2010 Trail Journal

TGO Planning Guide
The Going Lighter Guide



Lightweight Kit Lists

Contact by email

Categories

Archives

Search

Check Out ...

21 Hikes, 1 Ride/9 Peaks — Peace One Day
A Little Bit About Not A Lot
AktoMan
Alan Sloman’s Big Walk
Alastair Humphreys — Adventurer
Ali and Lay’s Mountaineering Blog
Backpackinglight.co.uk
Batish’s Blog (Hiking in Japan)
Beating the Bounds – Mark Richards’ Blog
Ben Collins — Cross Spain Walk – NEW
Cameron McNeish – ‘The Godfather’
Chris Townsend
Colin Griffiths — Colin’s Biking Bits
Colin Griffiths — Croft Hill Record
Colin Griffiths — Rich Gift of Lins
Collected Musings of a Hill Wanderer — John Hennesy
Cumbria Fell Raven
Daryl May’s Hike Through Britain
Dave Wood is Red Yeti
Dawn’s Outdoor Blog
Doodlecat: an alternative look at the great outdoors
ebothy
Fat Git Walking
Footprints Across Scotland — Paul Sammonds
Gayle E. Bird (and MIke)
Gyrovagus
Hard Light – Steve Walton
Hendrik's Hiking in Finland
Hennessy Blog
Hike Wales
Hike-Lite
I Would Rather Be Walking
I’m So Dave – LEJOG
James Boulter – Backpacking Bongos
John Hee’s Blog
John Manning
Judy Armstrong’s Alpine Challenge
London Backpacker
Lone Walker
Mark Alvarez
Martin Banfield – Postcard from Timperley
Mike Pitt
NEW — Laura LIddell
NEW — Louise's Big Adventure
NEW — Minimal Gear
NEW! — Self Powered!
Nielsen Brown
Northern Pies (Mike Knipe ate them …)
Peewiglet
Peewiglet’s Blog
Petesy’s Blog
Phil Turner – lightweightoutdoors.com/
Practical Backpacking Forum
Robin Evans – Blogpackinglight
Roman’s Lighthiker’s World
Ron’s Walking Fort Bragg Blog
Ryan Jordan
Section HIker — Phil Werner
Shed Dweller — John's Shed Dwelling Moments!
Solitary Walker
Steven Horner
Summit and Valley
Team io – Super ultralight gear in the UK
The Bearable Lightness, Gustav Boström
The Big Walk
The One and Only ‘Bearded Git’
The Roaming Dials
Three Peaks – Africa Expedition
Thunder in the Night — Joe Newton in Norway
Tommy Kelly
Two-Heel Drive
Walking with Paul Williams
Webtogs
Weird Darrren’s Whitespider1006 Blog

    Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License.