Must Be This Way

Home Dehydration | First steps with a Digital SLR Camera | First Steps in the Pyrenees | Home   

Photo Project: Exposure 1

Photo

OK, now it is time to move on to some of the more tricky, technical bits. We will start with exposure.

Take Lots of Photos

This might seem a little obvious, but the most important thing to do when stepping up to an SLR is to take lots of photographs. Again, digital makes the world a lot easier. In the days of film life was quite difficult for students of photography. Film was very expensive and there was no way out — you just had to buy it! With digital you can shoot as many photos as you want, simply deleting the dodgy ones.

Getting the Right Exposure

Most photographers shoot lots of pictures, often taking more than one shot of each scene. The reason they do this is to ensure that they have the best exposed shot to work from, either in the darkroom or in Photoshop.

Camera Light Metering

These days cameras come with very sophisticated light measuring systems (and we’ll talk more about these later). When your taking a landscape picture, the camera will take readings from many different parts of the scene and will average them out to give you a good, baseline for the photo. In many situations the camera metering works very well, but it can be fooled.

On a grey overcast day your camera metering system will be quite reliable. But on sunny days — when there is a great contrast across the picture —the camera’s calculations may not be reliable.

Believe me, there is nothing worse than getting home to find that one great shot is useless because the exposure is wrong!

Bracketing

In order to guarantee better results photographers employ a technique that they call bracketing. In simple terms the photographer (or camera) calculates the exposure and then takes a first shot. Then the photographer will ‘bracket’ the shot, taking one shot at a higher exposure and one at a lower exposure. This gives us a range of exposures to work on when we are back at the computer. In the field I might take four of five exposures of a really good shot,and I might calculate the base exposure in a variety of different ways (some tips coming up in a later post).

Taking landscape photos without bracketing is very dodgy. Why? Well, if some of the detail is over-exposed you’ll never be able to get it back, no mater how hard you try. Digital cameras are very tolerant of light and they have a wide latitude, in other words they can capture detail in remarkable conditions. But if the photo is ‘bleached’ that detail can never be recovered.

Let’s consider this shot.

DSC_3557

You can easily see that the picture is over exposed. We can deal with the land quite easily by adjusting brightness and contrast. But the sky is a real problem. There should be a lot of cloud detail here, indeed you get some hint of it. But the detail has been ‘bleached’. It simply has not been recorded by the sensor and nothing we can do can retrieve it. While digital cameras often record an amazing amount of detail in under-exposed parts of the print they are less tolerant to over-exposure.

This was the only shot I have of this scene — sometimes you don’t have time to bracket. It may have just been a spur of the moment shot and I guess it was — it’s not very interesting!

The shot was taken on an automatic setting. The camera was fooled by the light and set its exposure mainly for the foreground. Bracketing — taking a shot that was underexposed by one stop (or indeed two) might have really pulled this back. Don’t worry about ’stops’, we’ll come to that.

So detail can be lost. But bracketing also helps give us a better starting point for dealing with difficult scenes, for example, when there is terrific contrast between sun and shade. Consider this exposure.

Pyrenees-05-091

Quite a contrast! You can see that there is detail in the shady bits but the light bits are not bleached out. We’ll look at how to calculate a good starting exposure later on, but for this shot I took a manual exposure for the light, another for the dark and worked between the two. Then — using the very sophisticated shadow and highlight tool in Photoshop, I could deal with the balance of the shot. Here’s an example of what can be done.

Pyrenees-05-091-2

I’ve knocked this out quickly, but you can see that there is detail in both parts of the shot and — with a bit of work — I could balance this off nicely.

This is point of darkroom processing. But this only works if the detail has been captured. Without bracketing much of this detail would have been lost.

So, go and shoot lots of photos. If you get a good scene take your time. Take more than one shot. Bracket up and down.

To Bracket One ‘Stop’

fstops are worth a post on their own. But to bracket on stop either:

1. Increase the aperture by one whole increment – say from f11 to f8.

2. Decrease shutter speed by one ’stop, ie. go down from 125 to 60.

And then decrease exposure from the base, in other words go from f11 to f22 or increase speed from 125 to 250.

Bracketing Automatically

Many modern DSLRs allow you to bracket automatically when in one of the automatic mode. Basically, the first shot you take is at the base exposure, the second is under exposed and the third over exposed. You can often set the increments for over and under exposure.

Personally, I don’t find this helpful. It is far better to bracket manually as experience is key.

With experience you’ll be able to read the conditions more. You might work out that a 1 stop bracket will work or you might decide to bracket at 1 stop and at 1.5 or even 2 stops. This really means working in manual.

Manual exposure is not really that complicated. get out and try it and have a look at the results when you get home. The computer will have stamped the exposure details on each shot and you can see how bracketing has had an impact on your shot.

If you want to be sure of getting that shot — then bracket, bracket, bracket !!!!

Next time we’ll look further into exposure, looking at different exposure modes in the camera and some tips as to where to calculate exposure in a scene.

posted by andy on 09.10.08 @ 9:32 am | 10 Comments

10 Comments so far
Leave a comment

Great stuff, thanks! I had no idea about any of this.

I’ll go and try it all out, but one question in the meantime. You say to do the bracketing by adjusting either the aperture size or the shutter speed. Does it matter which one we go for?

By Peewiglet on 09.10.08 1:57 pm

coming in the next installement!

By Andy on 09.10.08 10:44 pm

10:44pm? Weren’t we still in the pub at that time? *g*

By Peewiglet on 09.11.08 12:39 am

And for the cameras that have no manual settings you can often fool the camera by pointing at the sky, apply partial pressure on the shutter button, swoop to your desired subject and then press the shutter button. This avoids the over exposure of the sky. The other way round also works, point at the ground, apply partial pressure…

By David on 09.11.08 8:41 am

That will be the subject of the next in the series !!!

By Andy Howell on 09.11.08 12:27 pm

PW: YOU were still in the pub — I was long gone :-)

By Andy Howell on 09.11.08 12:28 pm

Whatever you do do not look at P…t’s blog and if you do dwell on thi: A dog will look up to you. A cat cat will look down on u but a pig will look at u between the eyes.
Moving on – I know your pieces on D.photography will improve my hit rate. I have a question tho about the dynamic ranges of the chips used in the entry level DSLRs. If you trying to record a north facing facet in early morning deep shade against a radiantly blue sky can you ever hope to get good exposure on both without layering an merging 2 seperate photos on P.shop or equivalent. I ask because your superb photos have captured enormous ranges of luminosity. Have you merged photos or selected and played with sectors of the shots on P.shop. Supplemetary uestion. Out of 1000 photos – how many blow your hat of when you get home. My current ratio is about 2000:1

By Fred on 09.11.08 7:08 pm

Fred said:
Whatever you do do not look at P…t’s blog and if you do dwell on thi: A dog will look up to you. A cat cat will look down on u but a pig will look at u between the eyes.

Lol! And then it will produce a revolver and shoot you, if you don’t hand over your tent… *g*

By Peewiglet on 09.17.08 12:53 pm

Truly excellent pictures – what camera is it that you use? I keep thinking about an SLR as they’ve come down in price but just need to make that bold jump…
Thanks for the great pics,

Ben M
http://blog.cheaptents.com

By Ben on 09.19.08 11:33 am

I use a Nikon D70. The Nikon D80 is good and the D60 is increasingly a good bargain. Both are better specified than my D70. The D40 is cheap and the same quality as my D70 now!

By andy on 09.19.08 1:33 pm

RSS feed for comments on this post.


Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

(required)

(required)




RSS Newsfeed

Twitter: @mustbethisway
Twitter (all other stuff): @Andrew_Howell

Must Be This Way Twitter Twibe #MBTW

The Colin Ibbotson Pages

Guide to Home Hydration

FIRST STEPS IN THE PYRENEES SERIES

Pyrenees Trail Journal 2008 — Cauterets, Ordessa, Néovielle

Cairngorms by Sleeper, mini-break report

First steps with a digital SLR camera

TGO 2006 TRAIL JOURNAL
TGO 2007 TRAIL JOURNAL
TGO 2009 TRAIL JOURNAL
NEW—TGO 2010 Trail Journal

TGO Planning Guide
The Going Lighter Guide



Lightweight Kit Lists

Contact by email

Categories

Archives

Search

Check Out ...

21 Hikes, 1 Ride/9 Peaks — Peace One Day
A Little Bit About Not A Lot
AktoMan
Alan Sloman’s Big Walk
Alastair Humphreys — Adventurer
Ali and Lay’s Mountaineering Blog
Backpackinglight.co.uk
Batish’s Blog (Hiking in Japan)
Beating the Bounds – Mark Richards’ Blog
Ben Collins — Cross Spain Walk – NEW
Cameron McNeish – ‘The Godfather’
Chris Townsend
Colin Griffiths — Colin’s Biking Bits
Colin Griffiths — Croft Hill Record
Colin Griffiths — Rich Gift of Lins
Collected Musings of a Hill Wanderer — John Hennesy
Cumbria Fell Raven
Daryl May’s Hike Through Britain
Dave Wood is Red Yeti
Dawn’s Outdoor Blog
Doodlecat: an alternative look at the great outdoors
ebothy
Fat Git Walking
Footprints Across Scotland — Paul Sammonds
Gayle E. Bird (and MIke)
Gyrovagus
Hard Light – Steve Walton
Hendrik's Hiking in Finland
Hennessy Blog
Hike Wales
Hike-Lite
I Would Rather Be Walking
I’m So Dave – LEJOG
James Boulter – Backpacking Bongos
John Hee’s Blog
John Manning
Judy Armstrong’s Alpine Challenge
London Backpacker
Lone Walker
Mark Alvarez
Martin Banfield – Postcard from Timperley
Mike Pitt
NEW — Laura LIddell
NEW — Louise's Big Adventure
NEW — Minimal Gear
NEW! — Self Powered!
Nielsen Brown
Northern Pies (Mike Knipe ate them …)
Peewiglet
Peewiglet’s Blog
Petesy’s Blog
Phil Turner – lightweightoutdoors.com/
Practical Backpacking Forum
Robin Evans – Blogpackinglight
Roman’s Lighthiker’s World
Ron’s Walking Fort Bragg Blog
Ryan Jordan
Section HIker — Phil Werner
Shed Dweller — John's Shed Dwelling Moments!
Solitary Walker
Steven Horner
Summit and Valley
Team io – Super ultralight gear in the UK
The Bearable Lightness, Gustav Boström
The Big Walk
The One and Only ‘Bearded Git’
The Roaming Dials
Three Peaks – Africa Expedition
Thunder in the Night — Joe Newton in Norway
Tommy Kelly
Two-Heel Drive
Walking with Paul Williams
Webtogs
Weird Darrren’s Whitespider1006 Blog

    Creative Commons License
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.0 UK: England & Wales License.